For a moment, try to picture the Netherlands online gambling sector five years ago. It was marked by high internet penetration and a population that was already familiar with offshore gambling. So, when the country regulated this sector, operators from across Europe immediately recognized the opportunity sitting in front of them. Many of them believed the Netherlands would quickly become one of Europe’s strongest regulated gambling environments, given that Dutch consumers were already highly active online.
But even during those early launch months, the Dutch Gambling Authority, the Kansspelautoriteit (KSA), repeatedly emphasized that this market would not operate like a free-for-all expansion race. Yes, operators were welcome to participate, but only if they could demonstrate their ability to maintain strict compliance standards.
And now that the first wave of licenses is scheduled to expire in October 2026, operators are entering a far more demanding environment than the one they first joined in 2021. The renewal process is not just a routine administrative process but a detailed examination of how the operators conducted themselves throughout their time in the country.
The focus has shifted from growth alone
In the early days of regulation, the country focused a lot on channelization. The goal was simply to move players away from unlicensed offshore platforms to licensed ones. And in case something came up, the government could easily monitor and hold operators accountable. Interestingly, the strategy seemed to work reasonably well.
The Dutch market generated strong revenue shortly after the introduction of regulation, and many licensed casinos experienced rapid growth. According to a 2023 market scan, the market’s net gaming revenue (NGR) rose from roughly €2 billion in 2021 to €3.4 billion in 2022, representing an increase of about 85% year over year.
Another report revealed that approximately 762,000 people gambled online at least once in 2022, while channelization rates reached around 92%. Among new players who entered the industry after legalization, channelization reportedly reached 98%. Clearly, an overwhelming majority of players initially used licensed platforms rather than offshore ones. And as a forward-thinking operator seeking to seize market opportunities, you’ll definitely want to take advantage of such figures, which is exactly what the best Dutch online casinos are doing.
But as the market expanded commercially, concerns about player protection also grew in parallel. Stories started emerging about younger players spending heavily, even as aggressive advertising became nearly impossible to ignore, especially during sports broadcasts. As such, KSA had to shift its focus from channelization alone to ensuring that casinos were operating responsibly.
Exit plans and affordability checks in the framework
The regulator now requires operators targeting this market to submit formal exit plans. And perhaps you’re wondering why a regulator would ask companies how they plan to leave a market. Well, KSA just wants assurance that iGaming companies can shut down responsibly if necessary.
The regulator also expects casinos to provide documentation explaining how they’ll be communicating policy changes promptly. Should an operator fail to comply with these requirements, KSA would have no option but to reject the license application.
And even if you’ve been operating in this market and would want to renew your license, you’ll be required to demonstrate how you handled previous compliance obligations throughout your first licensing period. That means regulators will likely examine:
- Anti-money laundering procedures
- Secure verification systems
- Responsible gaming interventions
According to the regulator, “Providers that made mistakes in the past five years must explain during the application process how they have learned from previous mistakes and how they intend to prevent recurrence.” It further added, “If we find this explanation insufficient, the permit may be denied or additional conditions and restrictions may be imposed.”
When it comes to affordability, operators will have to intervene once players exceed certain thresholds. For players aged 18 to 24, checks begin once deposits surpass €300, while older adults face checks at €700. This is no joke, especially when you consider how expensive affordability systems can be.
The effect in the Dutch market and beyond
Imagine the hassle of balancing these three competing pressures, all at the same time:
- Maintaining revenue growth
- Retaining customers frustrated by restrictions
- Satisfying increasingly strict regulatory demands
It can actually be the reason some companies struggle to survive in this market in the long term. And if you’re keen, you may have probably noticed revenue declines in the regulated market. Recent statistics from KSA reported an 18.5% decline in 2025, following stricter deposit limits and higher taxes introduced in late 2024.
But again, after the 2024 changes took effect, the percentage of players losing more than €1,000 per month dropped from 4% to 1%. Such outcomes actually justify tougher oversight. And if there’s a European nation looking to strengthen its own gambling framework, these Dutch results provide a very persuasive blueprint.
Remember, problem gambling is a growing concern in Europe. According to NHS England, around 5% of European adults are at risk of experiencing gambling problems. And since the Dutch measures seemed to work to some extent, more countries in this continent could take a tougher stance, all to encourage responsible engagement.
About Author
